During data collection for the Progress Evaluation Audit, the Commission heard from members of the workforce that they believe AV SpeakUp is being used by some to take advantage of anonymity to make vexatious complaints. While the Commission was unable to find clear evidence of vexatious complaints, even the perception of them has negatively impacted people’s perceptions of the integrity of the system and their trust in the process.
Ambulance Victoria senior leadership noted that, while the potential for ‘weaponisation’ of the complaints process is a difficulty, protecting whistleblowers’ anonymity is a priority.
Research evidence suggests that in the health sector, vexatious complaints are relatively rare; however, identifying vexatious complaints can also be difficult given the complainant’s motivation is often concealed.[25] Although the actual incidence of vexatious complaints may be low, the emotional and reputational impacts on the person who is the subject of a vexatious complaint can still be significant.[26]
During the Progress Evaluation Audit, Ambulance Victoria senior leadership told the Commission that all anonymous complaints made through AV SpeakUp are assessed in the same way as any other complaint made directly to the PSBD, so that only complaints that meet established criteria are progressed further.
[25] Rachel Canaway, Jennifer Morris and Marie Bismark, Reducing, identifying and managing vexatious complaints: Summary report of a literature review prepared for the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (2017).
[26] ‘Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency – Vexatious notifications’ <https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Notifications/How-we-manage-concerns/Vexatious-notifications.aspx>.